Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
E-mail to a friend | Printer-friendly version | Discuss story

Guest commentary

Web page views play big role in editors' news judgment

Sometimes, even an expected result can be deflating.

One day the week before last, the most-viewed item on the San Francisco Chronicle's Web site, SFGate.com, was the Associated Press story that Czech supermodel Petra Nemcova had been injured in the Indian Ocean tsunami. That story outperformed at least a dozen more important articles about the disaster.

It came as no surprise. Our morning news editor had predicted the supermodel angle would top the page-view list when we were deciding how to play the story. (We wound up giving it a home page subhead, indicating we wanted readers to see the headline but didn't think it was big news.)

Vlae Kershner

Indeed, pop culture sometimes seems to dominate the Internet. Search engines' most sought-after terms are usually celebrity names.

Other topics that receive large numbers of page views include sex, local crime, weather and pro sports. Before the collapse of San Francisco's football team, I used to joke that the perfect headline to generate clicks would be "Couple arrested for having sex in rain at 49ers game."

Given results like those, it's no surprise that the journalistic community is suspicious of the use of Web hits in guiding editors' choices.

Do we use page views to help us determine the play of stories on our Web site? Hell yes!

Our success or failure is measured largely on the size and growth of our audience. The best way to keep it growing is to find out what people want to read and give them more of it.

If journalism faculty who decry the influence of entertainment values in news coverage would stroll over to their campus business schools, they might learn that the newspaper industry is under a great deal of pressure from alternative sources of news, and even more important, from competitors for advertising revenue.

The economic model for newsrooms that employ hundreds of journalists is threatened by the rise of classified advertising and shopping Web sites that pay little or nothing for content.

Measuring the news market

Against this backdrop, it's our job as Web site editors to increase the size of our audience by linking to stories and photos that will attract readers of various ages and interests. The job of the sales force is to convert that audience into revenue that both produces profits and supports an extensive news-gathering operation. The two sides shouldn't be in conflict.

Still -- and here I agree with the directors of Grade the News -- market-driven values can't be our profession's only touchstone. Otherwise, we'll be failing in our mission to inform the public and we'll lose educated, demographically desirable core readers.

While editors shouldn't let page views dictate story play, we shouldn't be timid about using data.

But there are solid reasons beyond audience size to make lighter items a part of the home page mix. Young people who come to the site for the celebrity column and Day in Pictures may stay to pick up some news they wouldn't otherwise see. And I suspect that everyone, even college professors, can appreciate that life shouldn't be lived with a scowl and would like some smiles from a news Web site.

In that respect, we are more fortunate than our big brothers and sisters on the print side -- at any given time, we have about 40 links on our home page. That means we're able to both provide the most important stories and highlight items we know will attract readers. We help signal the difference by reserving the top right of the home page for the top news and putting a lot of the fun stuff in the "More News and Features" box.

While we report page views to the newsroom, they are used only in the most general way in determining story play in the physical Chronicle. In our reports, we caution that the data can be highly misleading.

Some stories move way up in the rankings because they receive links from large national sites. Our most viewed stories of 2004, an eclectic bunch, were mostly those that got prominent links elsewhere.

Your gut isn't infallible

Still, sometimes the use of page views could save newspaper editors from making mistakes based on misguided instincts.

An early sign that Howell Raines might be editing the New York Times according to his whims came in a New Yorker article that said he told his sports editor to put more emphasis on college sports. I doubt he asked the Times' Web editors for any data before making that decision.

We know from page views that there is less than half as much reader interest in major college sports in the Bay Area as there is in pro baseball and football. The disparity, I'd wager, is even greater in the New York area, which doesn't have a single big-time college football program.

Page views can be a tip service. Within days of the disappearance of the pregnant Laci Peterson, page views told us -- and print-side editors -- that reader interest was unusually high. But Robert Blake's murder trial? Practically no one in our audience cares.

Equal weight?

The fatal dog-mauling of lacrosse coach Diane Whipple was instantly a leader -- I'd never seen a story that broke on a Friday night get that many clicks. But a few months later, when Shawn Jones, an African-American boy from Richmond, was mauled by a pit bull and needed months of surgery, the audience wasn't nearly as interested.

Differences in the race and social class of the dog-mauling victims appear to be factors in this disparity. In cases like this one, it's the responsibility of editors to ignore page views and make sure that victims' stories and appeals for help on their behalf receive adequate coverage.

What about significant investigative and enterprise stories? While there's some fear that use of page views will get the business types muttering that serious journalism isn't cost-effective, that's not necessarily the case.

Some major series -- for example, our continuing coverage of San Francisco's homeless crisis -- have gotten loads of page views, especially because of photos there wasn't space to run in the newspaper. And that series has had a long shelf life.

Among other serious topics, science, technology and city politics often prove popular with our audience.

To sum up, while editors shouldn't let page views dictate story play, we shouldn't be timid about using data as important tools in attracting and retaining readers. We need every edge we can get.

Vlae Kershner, who has had occasional friendly disagreements with communications department faculty since he was the editor of the Stanford Daily, is the news director of SFGate.com.


What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.